Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Hal L
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T13:18:23Z
dc.date.available2017-05-30T13:18:23Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationClin Med (Lond). 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):23-7.language
dc.identifier.urihttps://orda.derbyhospitals.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/1074
dc.description.abstractAll gastroscopies and colonoscopies performed in two U.K. teaching hospitals over a period of one year were audited to investigate whether endoscopic reporting of gastroscopies and colonoscopies by different endoscopists is consistent. Endoscopic diagnoses were retrieved from the hospitals' endoscopy databases. The results of 1814 colonoscopies and 2127 gastroscopies were analysed using chi2 (Chi squared). The frequency of reporting common diagnoses was variable and the differences between specialist endoscopists were highly significant, including for important conditions such as peptic ulceration (range 2-10%, p = 0.001) and colonic polyps (16-45%, p < 0.001). There is a large variation in the frequency of the diagnoses reported by different endoscopists. This is unlikely to be explained by casemix or chance. This may have major implications for the health of patients. More emphasis must be placed during training on the correct interpretation of endoscopies.language
dc.language.isoenlanguage
dc.titleVariations in the reporting of endoscopies by different endoscopistslanguage
dc.typeArticlelanguage


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record